Wherever politics tries to be redemptive, it is promising too much. Where it wishes to do the work of God, it becomes not divine, but demonic.” —Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI

Liberation Theology

Liberation theology sprang up in the late 60s and went into decline in the late 80s when the Iron Curtain fell. It still lingers on in Black Theology and Feminist Theology, however. Liberation theology claims to be Christian. It claims to be a way of doing theology and living out the gospel in practical terms. On the surface, its emphasis is social justice and human dignity. It insists that God champions the marginalized, the needy, and the despised. It boldly affirms that, “God is on the side of the poor.” It tells us that the goal of the Church, and the goal of every man of good conscience, ought to be a world free from racial discrimination, economic inequality, and political imperialism.

Liberation theology locates sin, not in individuals, not in the heart of man, but in the collective, in society and its social structures. The remedy for this sin then isn’t the spiritual conversion of the individual, but a violent alteration of oppressive economic and political structures. (The liberation theologians have more than a passing acquaintance with the works of Karl Marx.)

For liberation theology, God does not save man. Man saves himself through political means, but those means must be quick and decisive. Charitable aid from without and progressive reform from within are inadequate: they are too little, too late, and are a slap in the face of human dignity. Liberation must be immediate. Anything else is a betrayal of justice and complicity with the corrupt system. And so the State must intervene. That is, either foreign governments must apply political pressure on the offending government until it makes radical changes or abdicates its authority, or insurgents must capture the existing political structure and thoroughly rework it. In most cases, violence, revolution, and terrorism will not only be necessary, but will even be a “righteous” part of the process. In the end, the political and social order will be overthrown, and equality will be established among all social and economic classes. Of course, we are talking about socialism. For liberation theology, socialism is the necessary foundation for a just and free society. As to the practical details… as usual, those are somewhat vague.

The Exodus

Liberation theologians and their evangelical admirers often see the Exodus as a paradigm for the way that liberation ought to happen. They see God intervening violently in history to liberate a poor, oppressed people, and in this they find a summary of the gospel message. Hollywood has told the Exodus story a number of times, though never with much accuracy. Here is a summary of the actual history:

Israel and his family descended into Egypt to sojourn there during a time of great famine (Gen. 45—50). There they multiplied and prospered (Ex. 1:7). And there their descendants learned to worship false gods (Josh. 24:14). In time, God gave the children of Israel over to oppression and bondage. A new pharaoh enslaved them, and then he or a successor tried to destroy them (Ex. 1:8-22). The children of Israel labored in brick and mortar. When they cried out in misery, God raised up Moses as a deliverer (Ex. 2—7).

Moses, once a prince of Egypt, stood before Pharaoh and demanded the release of Israel. Pharaoh would hear nothing of it. He hardened his heart against God’s command. What followed was utter destruction as God sent plague after plague against Egypt (Ex. 7—12). The horror and devastation involved was something that Hollywood special effects and computer animation can only hint at.

When God was done, Pharaoh relented and released Israel. But almost immediately he changed his mind and set out with his army to recapture his former slaves. When Israel escaped Egypt through a miraculously divided Red Sea, Pharaoh chose to pursue. And, Hollywood to the contrary, he was overthrown in the sea (Ex. 15:19; Ps. 135:9).

Now, to see whether or not the liberation theologians have any claims on the Exodus, we need to look more closely at God’s motivations and the practical results of His war against Egypt.

God’s Covenant Promise

There were many slaves in the world when God raised up Moses. The world was full of poor and oppressed peoples. But God singled out Israel for deliverance. Why?

Because “God remembered his covenant with Abraham, with Isaac, and with Jacob” (Ex. 2:24). God had promised Abraham the land of Canaan and sealed that promise with a covenant oath (Gen. 15). God had sworn by His own life that He would bring his descendants back to the Promised Land after a time of exile and oppression. But those promises all swirled around the Seed, the Messiah, in whom all nations would be blessed (Gen. 22:15-18; cf. Gal. 3:16). Those covenant promises moved God to redeem Israel to be His own: “And I will take you to me for a people, and will be to you a God” (Ex. 6:1-8). In short, God did not deliver an oppressed people, an enslaved people. He delivered His people. A people that were His by covenant.

Liberated for Service

When Moses stood before Pharaoh, he did not simply demand the liberation of Israel. His demand was very specific: “Let us go, we pray thee, three days’ journey into the desert, and sacrifice unto the LORD our God…” (Ex. 5:3; cf. 3:18). Earlier, in His conversation with Moses, God had put it this way: “And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith the LORD, Israel is my son, even my firstborn: and I say unto thee, Let my son go, that he may serve me…” (Ex. 4:23).

God did not randomly deliver the people of Israel from Egyptian bondage so they could do as they pleased. He delivered them so they could worship and serve Him. He became their Redeemer so that they might become His servants. As Bob Dylan put it, “You gotta serve somebody.”

A War Against Egypt’s Gods

The issue then, was more than socio-economic, more than political. Israel had chosen false gods in Egypt, and behind those gods were demonic powers. The plagues on Egypt were a war against Egypt’s gods. “And against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgment” (Ex. 12:12). Yahweh turned the Nile into blood: He multiplied frogs; He turned the fertile land into lice; He blotted out the sun. Osiris, Haqet, Isis, and Ra were gonna get whacked. So was the man-god, Pharaoh. So were the demons who empowered Pharaoh’s magicians. Yahweh overthrew them all. He showed Himself to be the only true God, the sovereign Lord of history (Ex. 15:1-19; 18:11; Josh. 2:9-11).

The Destruction of Egypt

God brought the judgment. So the violence came from Him and not His people. He destroyed Egypt’s crops, cattle, and army. He killed their ruler and his heir. He killed at least one male (the first born) in every household. He confiscated the Egyptians’ treasures as payments for Israel’s years of bondage. He made Israel relatively rich, as well as made Egypt desperately poor, and left the nation wide open to invasion. But He didn’t install His people as the new socialist lords of Egypt. He brought Israel out of Egypt, and they weren’t supposed to look back.

The Blood of the Lamb

In connection with the last plague, the death of the firstborn, God instituted the Passover (Ex. 12). God required His people to kill a lamb and splash its blood on the doorposts and lintel of their homes. They were to eat its meat, roasted and with bitter herbs, as a communion meal with God their Redeemer. Those whose homes were covered by the blood would be safe from the destroyer. Those who refused the blood would suffer judgment. The first born of the house would die.

God’s redemption required a substitutionary death and required faith in a gospel of blood atonement. Those who did not believe, who trusted in race or works, would suffer the same judgment as their Egyptian oppressors. On the other hand, any Egyptian who put himself under the blood would save himself and his household. Apparently, many non-Israelites did believe, as we are told that a great “mixed multitude” left Egypt with Israel (Ex. 12:38). The gospel of the Exodus was for Hebrews and Gentiles alike.

“They Shall Not Enter Into My Rest”

The story of the Exodus does not end at the Red Sea. The children of Israel went to Mt. Sinai and there received the Law of God (Ex. 15—20). They then journeyed on to the Promised Land, but when they saw the great walled cities and the giants who held them, they rebelled and refused to take up the war God had set before them (Num. 13-14). God barred them, and the whole generation that came out of Egypt, from ever entering the Promised Land. Their release from physical bondage had not reached to their hearts. They were still slaves to sin and self by nature and so not fit to fight the battles of the Lord. Because of this, the promised land of sacred liberty lay forever beyond their grasp.

The Nature of Liberty

Jesus said that whoever commits sin is the servant or slave of sin (John 8:34). He taught that bondage to sin is the ultimate slavery. Until men are rescued from that spiritual bondage, no substantial or long-term liberation on any other level can succeed. Everything governed by sin descend into selfishness, oppression, hatred, and violence. Neither good intentions nor slick propaganda can alter that reality. Those who call for liberation apart from the blood of Christ are inviting us all to a man-made hell. In this world “freedom” always becomes slavery.

Conclusion

The Exodus story is a paradigm or model for liberation. In the Exodus, God redeemed His covenant people from bondage to false gods and the human tyrant who ruled in their name. He brought His people through the baptismal waters of the Red Sea, fed them with spiritual food and drink. He brought them to Sinai, gave them His laws, came down in glory and hung out in their midst. He led them on to conquer the inheritance He had promised. Certainly this is a foreshadowing of the gospel of grace, of redemption in Jesus Christ. One thing is certain… the Exodus story has nothing to do with liberation theology and socialist tyranny.

For further reading:

Harold S. Martin, “Fallacies of Liberation Theology,” Brethren Revival Fellowship. January/February, 1980 Volume 15, No. 1, <http://www.brfwitness.org/?p=377>.

Kyle-Anne Shiver, “Obama’s Politics of Collective Redemption,” American Thinker, March 3, 2011, <http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/02/obamas_politics_of_collective.html>.

David Chilton, Productive Christians in an Age of Guilt Manipulators (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, 1985).

Gary North, Liberating Planet Earth (Ft. Worth, TX: Dominion Press, 1987).

6 Comments

  • Avatar
    BigPicture Posted March 20, 2011 12:21 pm

    I believe all known systems of governing will lead to slavery. As so long as money is used. Evolution of man will see it’s death by power/money or will be liberated by the elimination of it. Sounds crazy, maybe…but ” With – With out ” is at the bottom line of all pain and suffering in the world, through out the history of human kind. I believe people need to start making a real effort to help and care for the rest of man kind (& nature, in general). We will never live in harmony while our goals in life are based on working for money. If the human race was based on human/ nature progress rather then money for “freedom”, we’d see a life that our children would be happy to be apart of (not struggle to be a part of). Humans are truly in-slaved by their own design. MONEY = SLAVERY
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7065205277695921912#
    For an eye opening view of life, religion, nature. Please read ;
    http://www.amazon.com/Ether-God-Devil-Cosmic-Superimposition/dp/0374509913
    Much love !

  • Avatar
    Proetius Posted March 20, 2011 5:40 pm

    According to your article Mr Heid, it would seem that you would seem to still prefer to have black slaves in the South still picking cotton with no access to education and no wish for themselves to be free with no hope in God, the same God of Abraham, Isaac & Jacob who they prayed to free them from their bondage, unless you truly believe they were not bound. Who are we to judge that God’s sovereignty in political access, abolitionism and just pure love for the oppressed and the Love of God had granted them freedom after much suffering. You must remember according to the scriptures that a host of those who left Egypt with the Israelites had observed Passover with them and according to the Law of God given to Moses that these (egyptians) who were with them would no longer be called foreigners if the observed to do all that was within the law. They were essentially grafted to be Isrealites as well. Which God continually says it is not by the letter of the law only but by the Spirit. What do you think makes God such a sepratist, that if one serves the True & Living God if he is other than an Israelite not allowed to cry out for Freedom & Justice and that God would not hear them. I believe you err in how you have demonstated to illustrate your position. Freedom & Justice should never be a political issue but an inherent and a spiritual right first given by God to serve Him. You must understand that those who preached the Liberation Theology to serve themselves have not done so to get political gain but used a political platform to gain money, power, prestige & usury to control.These are the devices of Satan. Even the Romans, Pharisees & Saducees of Jesus’ day had done that. The oppressed had none of this. Jesus came to let the oppressed go free. He also stated that the one who would come to Him, He will in no wise cast out. To be truly free is to not be bound by Satan’s devices which can be found in any political arena, with any political party or with any Theology. Freedom, the way, the truth and the life is found in the light of Jesus Christ and God’s precepts.

  • Avatar
    gardenmamaof5 Posted March 21, 2011 4:54 pm

    Bill Heid,
    Thank you for such a fantastic article. Your writings are always an encouragement to me and I often have my home schooled children read them. They challenge my kids to develop deeper and more intricate thinking skills that are completely intertwined with a Biblical worldview. Keep them coming!

  • Avatar
    patiba Posted March 21, 2011 5:03 pm

    It’s crucial that this article doesn’t cite any actual liberation theologians, since they don’t defend the positions attacked here. Most of them just want people to take the Sermon on the Mount seriously. Why go after fictional opponents? Conservatism proves its idolatrous nature once again. Why is it that conservatives get all uncomfortable and unable to repeat Jesus’ sermon on the plain? “But woe to you who are rich, For you have received your consolation” (Lk. 6). Why can’t conservatives naturally recite Mary’s magnificat? “He has put down the mighty from their thrones, And exalted the lowly” (Lk. 1). Because conservatives don’t preach Jesus’ gospel. They preach Adam Smith’s pantheism.

    • Avatar
      Steve Posted March 29, 2011 3:29 am

      Your comment confuses me. My knowledge of Liberation theology rests primarily on the backs of certain South and Central American Clergy who were willing to party themselves with violent overthrow of regimes, albeit repressive ones. Their methods were often not so much socialist but Marxist. Their liberation was to be delivered by violent means, often as savage and inhuman as the practices of those they wished to overthrow. Now, what part of that exactly, indicates they took the Sermon on the Mount seriously? And what fictional opponents? It is not conservatism to mention Fr. Ernesto Cardenal, perhaps the most famous liberation theologian of the Nicarguan Sandinistas, who also accepted a ministerial position in the Sandinista government while still a priest. I think many will remember the image of Pope John Paul II, on his visit to Nicaragua in 1983, openly censuring Cardenal at the airport, for directly disobeying a papal order to resign from the government. I think that scolding qualifies as consequential to being contemptous of the Sermon on the Mount.

      Other than that, I fail to grasp how conservatism “proves its idolatrous nature once again” given that Jesus was a strict conservative, holding onto every letter of the law, which He did not want to do away with but to fulfill. The new liberation that came from Jesus’ ministry was definately new, mostly unheard of in those times, but ALWAYS obedient to His Father in heaven. Perhaps, rather than conservatism, you meant capitalism, and if so, then I wholeheartedly agree.

  • Avatar
    PersonalView Posted April 9, 2011 6:05 pm

    It amazes me how Heid and many others cannot understand the basic message of the Scripture. You cannot teach about the Message if you don’t have the fundamental human nature that God has created in humranity. How can anyone support stealing from, robbing, and oppressing their fellow humans, then telling them that they have no rights under God to redress their condition. Pat Roberston said that God is punishing Haiti because they rebelled against their “masters”. Heid is saying the same thing, in essence. Stop playing behind words like ‘conservatism’, ‘liberalism’, ‘socoialism’, etc. When polled, even Americans think that wealth should be more equally distributed. That means that the basic human nature recognizes that those who have gained on the backs of other humans, owe those humans that they have used. I have no problem with gaining of wealth. I believe that God has no problem with gaining of wealth. However, I believe that God have repeatedly and determinately commanded against oppression, usury, tyranny, etc. I also believe that God gave instructions to humans on proper conduct. Read the Ten Commandments… that is the essence of the instructions. Fair dealings, respect for life, want for your brother/sister what you want for yourself. And remeber, the attitude and failure of Satan is that he believed he was better that humanity. He thought the world’s resources were for his use, but God created the resources for use by His humans. His humans are not bound by race, sex, nationality, religious affiliation, but only by those who are committed to Him. However, God also states that He rains blessings on both the righteous and the wicked. If you understand this, you understand that the resources belong to everyone, not just those who can devise and hoard things like ‘money’, etc.

Add Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *